Featured Article

1

Case Today Gitmo Two To Be Heard By Supreme Court

1The Supreme Court will now, March 1, commence the hearing of a case in which two men – Margaret Bamful, an 86 year old retired policeman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Henry Nana Boakye, a pupil of the Ghana Law School – have filed a suit from the Attorney General and Minister for the Interior from the importation of both Guantanamo Bay detainees to the nation.

Madam Margaret Bamful and Henry Nana Boakye about per month ago filed a case from the Attorney General and Minister of Justice and Minister of Interior accusing President John Mahama of illegally bringing the two former Gitmo detainees to the nation, without regards to the laws of the land

Regrettably, both the Minister of Interior along with the Attorney General has not filed their defense at that time of going to press, as to the suit.

The actions of both defendants so represents a violation of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 (CI 16) which gives a defendant that is served using a writ and statement of case 14 days to file a reply.

An investigation conducted on February 9, 2016, in the registry of the Supreme Court, shown that Minister of Interior and the Attorney General were served on January 22, 2016 with all the plaintiffs’ statement of case.

The Supreme Court has additionally served on both defendants a hearing notice, notifying them that without their look or with, the case will be called for hearing.

The plaintiffs are seeking among other reliefs a “declaration that on a true and appropriate interpretation of Article 75 of the1992 Constitution of Ghana, the President of the Republic of Ghana acted unconstitutionally by consenting to the transfer of Mahmud Umar Muhammad Bin Atef and Khalid Muhammad Salih Al-Dhuby (both profiled terrorists and former detainees of Guantanamo Bay) to the Republic of Ghana, with no ratification via an Act of Parliament or a resolution of Parliament supported by the votes greater than one half of each of the members of Parliament”.

They’re additionally seeking a “declaration that on a true and appropriate interpretation of Article 58(2) of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana, the President of the Republic of Ghana, who’s under an obligation to implement and keep the laws of Ghana violated the Anti-terrorism Act of 2008 (Act 762) and also the Immigration Act of 2000 (Act 573), both being laws passed under the 1992 Constitution of Ghana.

The plaintiffs also are seeking a declaration that President Mahama broken Article 58(2) of the 1992 Constitution by agreeing together with the USA government to possess the former Gitmo detainees transferred to the nation.

“A declaration that on a true and appropriate interpretation of Article 58(2) of the 1992 constitution of Ghana, the President of Ghana is below the duty to implement and take care of the anti-terrorism Act of 2008 (Act 762) and also the Immigration Act of 2000 (Act 573), both being laws passed under the 1992 constitution of Ghana”.

The plaintiffs will also be seeking a declaration that, in accordance with chapter 5 of the 1992 constitution, their essential human rights are being breached by President Mahama, by holding the former Gitmo detainees under limited conditions, with no valid order from a court of competent authority and so acting unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs are requesting the Supreme Court to hold the constant and receiving stay of the former Gitmo detainees in the state is unlawful.

Moreover, they may be seeking an order directed in the Minister of Interior to, with immediate effect, return the two former Gitmo detainees in the United States back to the award of price for counsel fees and court expenses and also the United States of America.

News & Opinion

Give Your Self The Very Best Acne Skin Care

You know as well as everybody else that businesses and stores give away free stuff all of the time. In light of that fact, it should be of no surprise then to learn that various beauty vendors are prepared to offer you age reversing cream at no cost. Yes it’s true, you won’t need to pay for anti wrinkle cream, you can acquire it absolutely free. Sounds too good to be true, right? Well, in an in very real way, it is.

Spinach – Advantages of Spinach are numerous but for our discussion let us keep it only for the skin. Spinach is a storehouse of minerals and vitamins that help in keeping skin cells young and produce more collagen.

Using ONLY super slow techniques to remove facial wrinkles just isn’t a smart option. Why? Because by the time results even start to show, new wrinkles will have likely already formed and will require your attention — you’ll be behind before you even have a chance to get ahead. If you want to make such changes, that’s completely fine and more power to you. BUT, such changes cannot be the only thing that you do if you wish to look younger and get rid of facial wrinkles fast.

Dry skin care is critical in the summer season. Lips tend to become dry in this season. Having a lip balm handy can reduce the dryness and render a moisturizing skin free of lip skin irritations.

Avoid red meat and processed sugar. These two ingredients can aggravate your acne. You can take more honey in the place of sugar. Add honey for the fresh fruit juices, instead of regular sugar. Honey purifies the blood naturally. It removes the bacterial infections from the blood and soothes your skin.

Not even the best eye cream or natural wrinkle cream can replace a good night’s rest. Several areas connected with CocoaBurn and subject areas useful to knowledgeable specialists can be found about the web pages on this set up website. Without the proper amount of sleep, your skin will not be able to recuperate itself from daily stressors.

This website is designed to show what the latest products are in the market. They will then compare this to other products to see which are most effective on the market. This particular company also has guides for other solutions for anti-aging and what they mean. Articles on things such as Botox, ingredients for anti-aging, and other medical treatments are compared to the products that are available.

Face wrinkle creams should be applied first thing in the morning. Wash your face with a gentle cleanser, then apply the cream for a fresh start to your day. You should put on another application at night, right before you lie down to sleep.

HomeoAge: An extract from Canadian Algae. It has great anti aging properties and works extremely well to repair the skin underneath your eyes. It rejuvenates skin cell and stimulate cellular growth. In the event you situated the resources beneficial in this useful write-up about Metabo Garcinia Cambogia you should have a look at more information on our blog and website. It is a powerful anti aging ingredients and is safe to use on the sensitive skin under your eyes.

After deciding on a product see if the company offers a free trial. Read the fine print. See how long you have to return the wrinkle treatment product if you don’t like it. Look to see what the shipping fee is and if there is a restocking fee should you decide to return the product.

When it comes to sun tanning and your skin, stay away! If you must have added color, use a cosmetic bronzer or self tanner. These are proven facts. The sun is not your friend when it comes to your skin. Repair the damage that has been done by using the best skin care products available. It’s well worth it!

Specials

1

Case Today Gitmo Two To Be Heard By Supreme Court

1The Supreme Court will now, March 1, commence the hearing of a case in which two men – Margaret Bamful, an 86 year old retired policeman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Henry Nana Boakye, a pupil of the Ghana Law School – have filed a suit from the Attorney General and Minister for the Interior from the importation of both Guantanamo Bay detainees to the nation.

Madam Margaret Bamful and Henry Nana Boakye about per month ago filed a case from the Attorney General and Minister of Justice and Minister of Interior accusing President John Mahama of illegally bringing the two former Gitmo detainees to the nation, without regards to the laws of the land

Regrettably, both the Minister of Interior along with the Attorney General has not filed their defense at that time of going to press, as to the suit.

The actions of both defendants so represents a violation of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 (CI 16) which gives a defendant that is served using a writ and statement of case 14 days to file a reply.

An investigation conducted on February 9, 2016, in the registry of the Supreme Court, shown that Minister of Interior and the Attorney General were served on January 22, 2016 with all the plaintiffs’ statement of case.

The Supreme Court has additionally served on both defendants a hearing notice, notifying them that without their look or with, the case will be called for hearing.

The plaintiffs are seeking among other reliefs a “declaration that on a true and appropriate interpretation of Article 75 of the1992 Constitution of Ghana, the President of the Republic of Ghana acted unconstitutionally by consenting to the transfer of Mahmud Umar Muhammad Bin Atef and Khalid Muhammad Salih Al-Dhuby (both profiled terrorists and former detainees of Guantanamo Bay) to the Republic of Ghana, with no ratification via an Act of Parliament or a resolution of Parliament supported by the votes greater than one half of each of the members of Parliament”.

They’re additionally seeking a “declaration that on a true and appropriate interpretation of Article 58(2) of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana, the President of the Republic of Ghana, who’s under an obligation to implement and keep the laws of Ghana violated the Anti-terrorism Act of 2008 (Act 762) and also the Immigration Act of 2000 (Act 573), both being laws passed under the 1992 Constitution of Ghana.

The plaintiffs also are seeking a declaration that President Mahama broken Article 58(2) of the 1992 Constitution by agreeing together with the USA government to possess the former Gitmo detainees transferred to the nation.

“A declaration that on a true and appropriate interpretation of Article 58(2) of the 1992 constitution of Ghana, the President of Ghana is below the duty to implement and take care of the anti-terrorism Act of 2008 (Act 762) and also the Immigration Act of 2000 (Act 573), both being laws passed under the 1992 constitution of Ghana”.

The plaintiffs will also be seeking a declaration that, in accordance with chapter 5 of the 1992 constitution, their essential human rights are being breached by President Mahama, by holding the former Gitmo detainees under limited conditions, with no valid order from a court of competent authority and so acting unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs are requesting the Supreme Court to hold the constant and receiving stay of the former Gitmo detainees in the state is unlawful.

Moreover, they may be seeking an order directed in the Minister of Interior to, with immediate effect, return the two former Gitmo detainees in the United States back to the award of price for counsel fees and court expenses and also the United States of America.